So what was it about the Proline you preferred?AKA Mickey Mouse f holes. Made by Peerless. Tension bar bigsby and a stud fixed bridge. I had one for a while and it was a fine guitar.
Not Dynasonics but DeArmond 2Ks (I think, if not, then DeArmond 2000s). It was a long time ago but the neck was not clubby nor super thin. Pretty much a standard feeling C. Parallel bracing with a soundpost.
For the price a good guitar but I traded it away as soon as I touched my first proline.
What I remember is that the first 512x's were made by Peerless with the tension bar bigsby, Mickey Mouse holes and a fixed adjustomatic bridge. Gretsch did not like the work Peerless did and changed factory (Samick, I think) where they made the smaller f-holes, regular bigsby and adjustable bridge, though jefferyLeePierre's guitar contradicts this. It is the first time I have seen a Mickey Mouse 512x with a regular bigsby and adjustable bridge (though admittedly, I was looking at these 14 years ago and not really noticed that much since)....
There are two versions of the 5129.
Mine is the first one with DeArmond 2000 pickups and B60 - then non tension bar Bigsby. It's a full hollow. It sounds epic!
The neck is not that big (e.g. less chunky than the neck of the G3140).
As far as I remember, the second version has smaller f-holes, a tension bar Bigsby and possibly the dual coil humbucker pickups that were used for the G5120.
The late '90s Sparkle Jets were solid...not weight relieved and the Filtertrons were ceramic magnets. I've been seeking one 2 years now but they are rare. @Sid Nitzerglobin has one and remember him saying that it was over 10 lbs.My first proline (I have a few) was a 1997 Red Sparkle Jet. It has a C profile, similar to the 5129 but it just fit perfectly in my hands. It is a 'solidbody' but super resonant and the hollow Electromatic was dead by comparison. Plugged in, the single coil DeArmonds are interesting but the humbucking filtertrons sounded just fabulous, gritty powerful crunch but not dark Gibson-like.
I don't think you can compare the two though. While some may find that a $500 and $1700 guitar sound and feel the same, that has not been my personal experience. In its category, the 5129 delivers beyond expectations.
What I remember is that the first 512x's were made by Peerless with the tension bar bigsby, Mickey Mouse holes and a fixed adjustomatic bridge. Gretsch did not like the work Peerless did and changed factory (Samick, I think) where they made the smaller f-holes, regular bigsby and adjustable bridge, though jefferyLeePierre's guitar contradicts this. It is the first time I have seen a Mickey Mouse 512x with a regular bigsby and adjustable bridge (though admittedly, I was looking at these 14 years ago and not really noticed that much since).
I'm pretty sure that all 512x's had DeArmonds and the Gretschbuckers showed up when the line was changed to the 5120's.
Another valid assumption is that I made a mistake and own the second version, the Samick oneFWIU, Samick made many more G5129s than Peerless. Those with B60s and floating bridges are Samick (like mine). Personally, I much prefer the B60.
There must be differences in internal construction and bracing for the screwed-on B70 and fixed bridge on the peerless (normally only found on centerblock models).
I've never even seen one so can't comment on sound or neck feel but I am one of many who lovvvve the KS model and will keep mine forever.
And BTW, my Samick was made in late 2004 (first year for that model). When the Gretsch Pages were active I registered mine with a pic and there were lots more Samick than Peerless at that time.
Cool. That Jet of yours really is a special run in my opinion. I know I don't need any new guitars but would pull the trigger for a used model if the price was right.@NJDevil.
My 1997 weighs in at 9.5 lbs. It is slightly chambered (so they say) but nothing like FMIC models (my 2005 Roundup weighs 6.8 lbs).
I made the price comparison because I feel that to make inexpensive production line models, certain compromises in terms of construction and material needs to be made and in my personal experience, I feel like these compromises can be heard. Of course, generalizations will always have inherent inaccuracies.